Make a donation with PayPal, VISA, Mastercard, American Express, Discover cards - it's fast, free and secure!

Home Page

Nonprofit founded in 1988

About SEI

Culture Change Letter
via email
61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  2 1  subscribe  index  feedback

Culture Change print magazine issues: 20  19  18  17  16  15  14  13  12  11  10  9  8  index

Pedal Power solutions to petroleum dependence and polluting vehicles: Arcata Library Bikes, Pedal Power Produce, and more!

CAOE - Committee Against Oil Exploration - stop offshore oil drilling to protect sensitive habitats and cut petroleum dependence.

Culture Change through music! The Depavers eco-rock!

Take our Pledge for Climate Protection and learn about the Global Warming Crisis Council.

SEI hometown action!
Arcata city council's proclamation against war on Iraq and Kyoto Protocol proclamation.

Overpopulation has become a reality.  Overpopulation Resources and News Tidbits

Sail Transport Network

Fact Sheets
Press Releases

Long Distance

"It's hard to destroy wilderness without roads." — Jan Lundberg, founder, Alliance for a Paving Moratorium, 1991

Road fighting news

Endangered Species Act listing crisis 

Go to Original
Scientists Seek to Add 225 Species to Endangered List

    Associated Press

    Wednesday 05 May 2004

Scientists, including acclaimed wildlife biologist Jane Goodall, joined environmental groups Tuesday in petitioning the government to add 225 plants and animals to the endangered species list.

    The species are not new to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; four-fifths have been on the agency's waiting list for a decade. Some have been waiting since 1975. The average is 17 years.

    Goodall, known for her pioneering research on chimpanzees, signed the petitions, joined by other prominent scientists including biologists E.O. Wilson of Harvard University and Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University.

    "Wildlife is facing serious threats almost everywhere," Goodall said in a statement. She accused the Bush administration of seeking to undermine the Endangered Species Act.

    Robert Hass, former poet laureate of the United States, said it's not too late to save the 225 plants and animals "languishing on the federal candidate list. It's time to open the doors of the ark and let them in."

    Eleven individuals and three environmental organizations filed the petitions, said Brian Nowicki, a conservation biologist with the Center for Biological Diversity, which organized the effort.

    A spokesman for the Interior Department accused the Tucson-based group of misrepresenting the realities of the endangered species program. Hugh Vickery attributed a decline in listing new species to "a flood of lawsuits" filed by the center and other plaintiffs since 1997.

    The 225 species listed in the petitions are from 39 states, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Mariana and Northern Mariana islands and American Samoa. Nearly half are from Hawaii.

    More than 1,200 species have been placed on the endangered list since the Endangered Species Act became law in 1973, Nowicki said. The Bush administration has listed only 31 species as endangered, in contrast to an average of 65 a year by the Clinton administration and 59 a year under the first President Bush.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

Go to Original

    Group Urges Species Protection
    Beth Casper
    Statesman Journal

    Wednesday 05 May 2004

A request includes one type of plant and two animal species in Oregon

    Two rare Oregon frogs and a plant need federal protection before they disappear, says a national group that has won lawsuits against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding these issues in the past.

    The Center for Biological Diversity in Tucson, Ariz., formally asked the federal agency Tuesday to list 225 plants and animals on the endangered-species list in an attempt to prevent them from going extinct.

    It is, by far, the largest request for listings in the history of the Endangered Species Act, which passed in 1973.

    Federal officials concede that the species identified are at risk, but they say that the cost of protection is prohibitive.

    All of the 225 species are on the candidate list, which means that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recognizes their plight but has other, higher-priority species to protect.

    Candidate species get no protection. There are 257 candidate species.

    "They are using the candidate list as a purgatory and a means to avoid listing," said Noah Greenwald, conservation biologist with the Center for Biological Diversity in Portland. "Since some of these species have been waiting for 20 to 30 years in cases, we feel that they can’t wait any longer. It’s just sad to see this poor implementation of the Endangered Species Act."

    But U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officials say that it would cost $153 million to move all the candidate species to the threatened or endangered list.

    "That is a huge amount of money," said Betsy Lordan of the agency. "You can’t just go to Congress and ask for $153 million to clear up the backlog - you’d get laughed at."

    Lordan also said that the center’s action is redundant because the agency already has reviewed each of the 225 species.

    "They are on the candidate list - not because listing is not warranted but because it is precluded by other, higher listing priorities, which is another way of saying that we don’t have the money to list them now," Lordan said. "So I would question what the center hopes to achieve by re-petitioning these species."

    Three Oregon species have been on the candidate list for many years and were included Tuesday in the center’s request for listing:

  • Oregon spotted frog: found in the Cascades from the Washington border to the Klamath River Basin. Candidate since 1991.
  • Columbia spotted frog: found in Eastern Oregon. Candidate since 1991.
  • Northern wormwood: a plant found along the Columbia River between Hood River and the John Day River. Candidate since 1985.

    A recent report by the Center for Biological Diversity stated that systematic delays, including lengthy waits on the candidate list, contributed to the extinction of 83 species between 1974 and 1994.

    But Russ Brooks, managing attorney for the Pacific Legal Foundation’s northwest center in Seattle, said that listing a species doesn’t help recover the species.

    "It seems to me that listing a species on the endangered species list is really a death sentence for that species," said Brooks, whose group represents private-property owners and others. "The history of the ESA shows that the only way - or often - that species comes off the endangered list is if it goes extinct. - The ESA should be recovering species. It is not recovering species that are currently listed. I don’t know what the Center for Biological Diversity thinks it is doing by asking for the listing of these 225 species."

    Others think that placing a species on the endangered-species list is the most basic of protections to prevent extinction.

    "Listing does matter," said Joe Bowersox, associate professor of politics in environmental and natural-resources policy at Willamette University. "The Endangered Species Act, for all of its criticisms by both environmentalists as well as commodity interests, it is still the No. 1 way to go about protecting at a national level sensitive, threatened and endangered species."

    The center’s actions, through lawsuits and formal requests, have helped to get listings for 339 species across the country - 25 percent of the species on the federal list.

    The protection of imperiled species has worsened under the Bush administration, Greenwald said.

    For example, he said, the Clinton administration listed 394 species compared with the Bush administration’s 39.

    "Other administrations have managed to list far more species," he said. "This is an administration clearly opposed to listing."

    And the budget argument doesn’t pass muster for Greenwald, who said that the Fish and Wildlife Service needs to ask for more money to be granted more money.

    "Fish and Wildlife says they need $153 million to address the backlog, but their request to Congress is $12.3 million," Greenwald said. "They request way less than they need - They’ve essentially created their own budget crisis."

    The finger-pointing goes both ways. Federal agency officials said that groups such as the Center for Biological Diversity cause the budget woes.

    "The center and other plaintiffs, beginning in 1997, have filed a flood of lawsuits requiring the service to designate critical habitat for already listed species," said Hugh Vickery of the agency. "This has diverted staff and resources from the listing of new species."

    Critical habitats are areas that are essential to a species’ survival.

    Vickery said that the listing budget has increased in the past several years but that $153 million would be a tenfold increase, something that no administration or Congress ever has indicated that it would support.

    "It’s the whole budget process that is fundamentally flawed," said Susan Ash, conservation director for the Audubon Society of Portland. "More money needs to be appropriated from Congress instead of the continued bowing down to industry interests - that cycle has got to change."


(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the above material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Culture Change has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Culture Change endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

The loss of a large cat species for a ROAD??

- April 29, Endangered Species Coalition

A new report to the European parliament warns that the Iberian lynx, now down to an estimated 135 cats and only 28 breeding females, is “on the verge of extinction” says The Guardian (UK) in its April 26 edition.  The population has plunged from thousands four decades ago and “the remaining animals are widely separated and there may be only one viable population left: in the Sierra Morena in southern Spain.”  And, that population is threatened by a new highway.  The report concludes that “the first extinction of a big cat species since prehistoric times would be an embarrassment to the European Union.”

- source: GREENLines, Issue 2097 
A daily news digest from the Endangered Species Coalition about imperiled species and the people working to stop extinction. For more on what you can do

Related discussion: 
Alliance for a Paving Moratorium webpage
See Culture Change magazine articles. 

Back to Home Page


Articles of interest:
Anti-globalization protest grows, with tangible results.  WTO protests page

Tax fossil-fuel energy easily
by Peter Salonius

UK leader calls War on Terror "bogus"

Argentina bleeds toward healing by Raul Riutor

The oil industry has plans for you: blow-back by Jan Lundberg

It's not a war for oil? by Adam Khan

How to create a pedestrian mall by Michelle Wallar

The Cuban bike revolution

How GM destroyed the U.S. rail system excerpts from the film "Taken for a Ride".

"Iraqi oil not enough for US: Last days of America?"

Depaving the world by Richard Register

Roadkill: Driving animals to their graves by Mark Matthew Braunstein

The Hydrogen fuel cell technofix: Spencer Abraham's hydrogen dream.

Ancient Forest Protection in Northern California . Forest defenders climb trees to save them.

Daniel Quinn's thoughts on this website.

A case study in unsustainable development is the ongoing crisis in Palestine and Israel.

Renewable and alternative energy information.

Conserving energy at home (Calif. Title 24)



Culture Change/Sustainable Energy Institute mailing address: P.O. Box 3387 , Santa Cruz , California 95063 USA
  Telephone 1-215-243-3144 (and fax)

Culture Change (Trademarked) is published by Sustainable Energy Institute (formerly Fossil Fuels Policy Action), a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) California non-stock corporation. Contributions are tax-deductible.