Culture Change
27 May 2020
Home arrow Petro-addiction arrow Celebrate the Stampede or Step out of It?
Celebrate the Stampede or Step out of It? PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 31
by Jan Lundberg   
25 September 2010
If being human and living have value, we ought to celebrate what we are and how we're doing. The only real celebration can be of the truth, based on joyous reality of an improved condition. Yet the truth today is that we are probably about to dangle from the noose that we ourselves stepped right into.

It's crazy to celebrate ecocide. Is there something else to celebrate that is also true? Sure, but it's not the whole truth: human dignity, beauty of life, love between two people -- wonderful and inspiring, but to celebrate them while closing off our senses to the bulldozing and poisoning going on around us is increasingly irrational. Being honest would to admit of our celebrations today, "We are making ourselves feel better, numbing the pain or fooling ourselves."

For most of us, our personal world and its challenges are all we can deal with. So, little triumphs like selling more widgets than one's co-workers, losing ten pounds of body fat, or quitting alcohol become major accomplishments -- kind of in a vacuum, typical of individualism connected with "divide and conquer." It is rare that one celebrates getting rid of his or her car, for one's lack of a four wheeled machine is commonly equated with hardship.

Andy Singer, Auto-Free Times

There is organized and individual resistance to ecocide, climate catastrophe, species extinction, weakening of the human gene pool, erosion of human rights, and the coming trampling and starvation of the overpopulation. But the odds are that you're not part of resistance. It is tiny and does not deserve to celebrate much with a one-in-a-thousand chance for success or victory -- odds worsening each day. What are we doing about this trend? Hardly anything; we keep up our activities in the dominant culture, often soothing ourselves electronically or going out to eat some trucked-in food. Ignorance or denial of overarching trends is bliss (and deadly). We may march on as protesters or blog on into the void, hoping to call attention to crises in need of a collective response.

There are times when amusement and passion can flow among those who are quite aware, resulting in some laughter between the tears -- but we know we are losing the fight. Many believe we have already lost. Interestingly, those who hold to that most pessimistic view (in all certainty, they feel) are unlikely to be activists or eco-warriors. Optimists keep busy, trying to help the situation. This gives them purpose, a little comfort, and a little hope at times, but no reason to really celebrate the health and glory of an Earth that can house in her bosom future generations of Earth's children.

The only honest thing to celebrate, if we are to celebrate the real truth, is the impotence of the human race to cease the killing of the Earth. I for one cannot do it, for who can embrace such a perverse idea? Yet, there are valid celebrations, even when times are worse than these, if the big picture is part of our perspective. Otherwise, celebration may simply be to numb the mind: "Woo-hoo! we're drinking a lot of beer!" Everyone, from the aware activist to the downtrodden street survivor (sometimes the same person embodies that spectrum), needs to celebrate. That's like everyone needing to breathe and urinate. Celebration is involuntary and somehow necessary for our species, such as after a good hunt or harvest.

But if we can somehow see that celebration is blind and irrational when we can't celebrate the truth, we might see that it's as crazy as trying to breathe underwater or urinating on our food. Since we would not do those things unless totally insane, we might be able to face that the dominant culture -- that says endless material expansion, greed, isolation from one another, and the cancer epidemic are acceptable -- is insane and finally must be stopped for good.

The lateness of the hour is such that we cannot wait and say, "We will gradually stop trying to breathe under water. We will only piss a little more on our food. Those are jobs, so we cannot shift away quickly, and besides there are alternatives around the corner if we change industrial investment." This indefensible and obsolete attitude can be found in the technofix camp, as in gradually reducing fossil fuels emissions only in one's mind or in legislation. Such a program of Hope wishes to rely on painlessly and miraculously bringing about a consumer economy of less-polluting technology while continuing ecocide, as growth, toxicity and the stampede over the ecological cliff are hardly discussed.

Some in the stampede yell "Faster! See how fast we can go! Our speed and unity brought us here, and standing still is to be left behind!" Such spokespersons own all the megaphones and all the other trappings of the herders of humanity, mainly electronic media, etc. Apparently the much vaunted medium of the internet is not altering the stampede significantly. What does that tell us? Hard to say. Even if through a mass awakening everyone wanted to stop the crazy stampede now, and tried to do so, we may not be able to stop it. This is because we are not the masters of the Earth; the Earth is our master and is on a course we largely set her on. We have barely begun to pay the price.

In this stampede we are somehow simultaneously trying to breathe under water (without scuba gear) and pissing on our food. This is absurd enough, but reality is worse than that: there are those holding our heads under water, while they themselves are under water, obliviously, forcing us to try to breathe. Similarly, there are those among us pissing on our food and aiming our own piss onto our own food. Mass acceptance of such a pickle indicates both the low level and unpopularity of resistance as well as the impotence of the many, who are mostly unaware of the tiny number who are resisting and laying the groundwork for a livable future.

It is apparently irrelevant that those of the elite, or "the few," are also killing themselves as they kill the Earth. It is apparently irrelevant whether the few are aware of it or not. For when the many are engaged in ecocide and suicide, wishing to remain ignorant and left in peace, closing their eyes to what is more painfully obvious by the day, the role of the few -- despite enforcing oppression and domination -- is not the prime factor in our lethal civilization's self destruction. Many social justice activists today, and all past crusaders for freedom and equality who took their stand prior to the ecological crisis, believe that the problem we face is merely the bad guys at the top, whether identified as politicians in the pocket of banksters, the Trilateralists, the Zionists, the Neocons, ad infinitum -- any bad guy or elite seen as blameworthy and threatening. For in a culture such as this, if one were to remove the head, ten aspiring Donald Trumps pop up to replace each of the few that could theoretically be taken down. At this point in history, focusing mainly on re-dividing the pie is not a solution of any kind, and in any case it is not happening.

The Earth First!ers point out there's no social justice on a dead planet. Actually, their bumper sticker is "There are no jobs on a dead planet," in argument against clear-cutting ancient forests, for example. Impeccable logic, but does it go far enough to acknowledge that the entire modern culture of industrialism, hard wired to the dwindling cheap petroleum, has no future? Does the well-meaning environmental activist acknowledge that industrialism needs to be rejected now, when it means switching wholesale from four wheels to two? As long as society has new cars made and sold when there are too many on today's roads, we are engaged in mass insanity. But Obama wants us to celebrate the so-called health of the U.S. automobile companies. This narrow impulse is propaganda for those who adhere to the nation's de facto slogan dating from post-WWII Imperial America: "What's good for General Motors is good for the country." When we go along with such leadership, whether of Obama or any other pillar of the status quo, we have gotten into a vehicle with a nut case at the wheel -- leading motorized lemmings over the ecological cliff. To growing mass disappointment, Obama wants consumers to celebrate now, urging them to honk and cheer and hope for a faster stampede, i.e., the "Recovery" that can't happen because the energy orgy is coming to an end -- most of the easily recovered, low-sulfur, light, cheap oil has been consumed.

Is it possible to piss on the whole stampede to good effect, or pull people's heads out of the water, making a social movement to save the herd and the planet? Not likely, unless the herd slows down. Unfortunately, the real slow-down will be due to lack of nourishment -- starvation due to the end of petroleum-based agriculture and transport. When this hits there will be revolt and chaos. The megaphones and signs will fall, with various stampedes surging in different directions. Which will be your stampede? It's nice to believe about oneself that he or she is outside the dominant stampede today, but it may be only possible to be on the periphery at best. One might survive in a form of eco-village or post-crash small town -- climate permitting. Being outside the U.S. offers more safety, such as in Bolivia where 80% of the population is non-dependent on fossil fuels. It's unfortunate that the stance of that nation's pro-development leadership is that climate change is just a problem of capitalism, and that domestic petroleum can and should be exploited.

The U.S. worker is increasingly pressured, especially in the Great Recession, to get with the program by associating with the vestiges of middle class living, and just saying no to homelessness. The poor are feared as bad news and bringing bad luck, even though for millions more of us poverty and homelessness are just one or two missed paychecks away. Hardly anyone is preparing for total global economic collapse, although some ponder it and there have been a couple of healthy adjustments to the Great Recession: less purchasing and more gardening. Unfortunately, without being able to read the writing on the wall, the average U.S. American tries to stay safe by being still, even when being swept over the cliff in the relentless (and to most of us invisible) stampede. A return to basic, traditional skills is wise before they are desperately needed again, but people feel they cannot do such a thing in advance without being paid for it.

One of the risks of letting change sweep over you is to perhaps meet unanticipated cruelty or bloodlust, such as happened in Republican Spain in the 1930s: insurgent fascists believing in the supremacy of the ruling class and of the church massacred workers just for being workers, for they might have been in militant anarchist and communist unions. Many victims were just undesirables wanting separation of church and state or standing up for women's rights. The Iberian workers and peasants did not fail to anticipate, nor were they very surprised by, the cruel reactionary force against them. The U.S. worker is in comparison out to lunch and far gone: part of a weakened, soft, drugged population without the perspective of the Spanish Republican and almost all peoples around the globe. U.S. Americans' perspective is of two kinds: on the right, the post-WWII myth of riding tall in the saddle (via cheap oil and expansion), and on "the left," believing the U.S. is a democracy that can be fixed by elections (instead of daring to get arrested in civil disobedience).

The goal of culture change is to have far more to celebrate about. Join us and step out of the stampede.

Don't Bring Me Down (eco/country rock song)
Click here to download

I just bought a ticket to succeed in society
Don't you ask no questions, better be nice to me
Don't bring me down
Don't you bring me down
Don't come around if you'd bring me down

I have always thought our flag was the best
I just close my eyes to nukes and all the rest
Don't bring me down
Please don't bring me down
I'd see you drown
Than let you bring me down

[guitar solo]

Put down your guitars, let's go buy some cars
Join the den of businessmen carving up the Earth
Don't bring us down
Keep your country sound
No money down
Stay on the merry-go-round

If you have no cash and cannot pay the rent
Prisons are for homeless too, justice is all spent

[guitar solo]

Down to the ground
I hear a shakin' sound.

- by Depaver Jan, recorded as a demo at home in 1994, is on CD "Redwood Dreams" (Volume One). It was performed at Blues Camp, Ft. Worden, Washington, 1995.

(in need of celebrating)
Comments (7)Add Comment
"Many believe we have already lost. Interestingly, those who hold to that most pessimistic view (in all certainty, they feel) are unlikely to be activists or eco-warriors."
Not true. You would probably label me a pessimist or fatalist, but I reject those labels. I've thought it too late for the past ten years, and just in the past week or so I've realized that effectively nothing will be done. Everyone else is now giving up on preventing climate change, and accepting that we must "learn to cope" with the inevitable. I feel sad at this development because it means people are not going to fight any longer; the liars and powerfucks have won their incomprehensible,Pyrrhic victory.
I just wanted to say that I've tried everything I could think of to bring this issue to people's attention,to try and sound an alarm, to get my ideas published, to put my life and reputation at risk to get people to wake up, and instead all I find is cheery-bullshit hope and denialism. People don't want to know, they despise me for mentioning anything dire, they retreat into their denialist fantasies (I do so, too), and want to go on with their little lives, changing their light bulbs and buying a paraffin-laden "eco" shopping bag for the grocery store so they feel like they're doing something. Largely, the general population is utterly ignorant about the topic and they don't know what to do about it anyway.
Every item I've tried to change in my own life has been a near impossibility, but I've tried to advocate for one thing that I find truly important which is sustaining the local ecosystem. However, even the people in my local group don't understand how important this is, and have a short-sighted attitude towards it all. The human race is bound to its own folly, and even if some can clearly see it to be so, the collective thrust of humanity is towards its own self-immolation. Sad. Will it be otherwise? Not likely.
Mark Ritzenhein
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +8
Excellent article Jan. I read a little article in Iowa showing a childs smiling face as he released two previously injured ducks into the wild after rehap. Heartwarming and inspiring. I then next read the following article about the lost tiger habitat...200,000 acres for biofuels. As a person who has made their lifes work the increase of renewable energy this really struck home. After watching the NatGeo pgm on Cuba last evening...I wonder about the entire capitalist paradigm. Does that put me on the "watch list"? Likely so. Keep up the work.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0
Celebrate... Hmmm... We are on an irreversible slide that will take us through the house of horrors -- the valley of the death of billions. No happy ending, no way to wake up from this nightmare. Most are still absolutely unaware. Perhaps there is less counter-productive panic that way. If there's nothing anyone can do about Anthropomorphically Induced Catastrophic Climate Change and Peak Everything any more... If it is just -politically impossible- to alter our course, maybe we should just wallow in ignorant bliss, in the fast-lane, of course. AC and Stereo on, blasting down the road, feverishly texting. Maybe we should celebrate all this death and destruction with a co-linear global self mutilation and sadomasochistic festival... Ah... right, we're doing that St. Vitus's dance already, to the tune of the big band march. But some pain is seeping through the cracks, a few folks are feeling it, and even talking about it. Apparently we're just not delirious enough yet. Hmmm, well, it looks like we're going to need much stronger drugs to be able to completely ignore this emerging catastrophe. With the right (positive) mental attitude, we'll be able to totally immerse ourselves in the experience, without feeling or thinking at all. Then everything will be simply delicious fluff... no content... just pure taste -- sweet as cotton candy but without the nutrition. Hey -- we'll be able to celebrate being 'comfortably numb', perhaps forever.

Read between the lines, maybe you'll hear a low growl. The closest I can get to celebration is growling along with the tune. OK, I'm a bit flat, but what do you expect under this load?

R. Dworsky
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +1

Mark Ritzenhein writes "Everyone else is now giving up on preventing climate change, and accepting that we must "learn to cope" with the inevitable. I feel sad at this development because it means people are not going to fight any longer; the liars and powerfucks have won their incomprehensible,Pyrrhic victory." -------------- as if the hypothesis that humans have caused climate change is well established , and that humans have the power to stage manage the climate. He obviously has not read much of the alternative climate science that the IPCC refuses to recognize or allow to be aired at its massively taxpayer financed international meetings. The IPCC has taken as its mandate HYPOTHESIS BASES EVIDENCE GATHERING, and will not entertain any research that does not support its preconceived assumption that human greenhouse gas emissions drive the global climate.

See reference to two recent scientific papers dealing with sunspots. These indicate that the world could be entering a multi-decade cooling period comparable to the Maunder Minimum from 1645 to 1715. The following article notes that some $80 billion has been spent over the past 20 years on research assuming interminable global warming. Virtually no investigations have been done on the consequences of global cooling.

Two years ago, William Livingston and Matthew Penn of the National Solar Observatory in Tucson, in a controversial paper that contradicted conventional wisdom and upset global warming theorists, predicted that sunspots could more or less disappear after 2015, possibly indicating the onset of another Little Ice Age, see:

Peter Salonius

email This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Peter Salonius
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0
RE: He obviously has not read much of the alternative climate science that the IPCC refuses to recognize, etc.
Actually, I disagree with the IPCC's conservative conclusions, which are politically driven in an underlying manner, but not by the participating scientists themselves but rather through the coincidence of scientific culture and political convenience. In other words, the scientists write out of sober self-restraint demanded by scientific method, and the UN participant nations approve of the most cautious path because it is political the easiest one to take.
Recent events--that is, in the past five years--have proven that this ultraconservative approach is inadequate to address the accelerating effects of global warming.
Global Warming is undoubtedly caused by human beings injecting CO2 into the atmosphere. Scientists have known about this effect for two hundred years; it is nothing new. Scientists spoke openly of CO2-atmospheric warming back in the 1950's, and there is plenty of solid scientifically-gathered data to confirm this as a fact. In fact, there is no other explanation which accounts for the rapid and ecologically devastating increase in global average surface temperature other than human activity.
The proposed alternative here--sunspots--has been well disproven elsewhere. In fact, the current amount of sunspot activity suggests that global average temps should be decreasing and they are only increasing. The next rebuttal will be that global warming ended in 2005, etc., but that "argument" is based upon the fraudulent manipulation of data. That is, in order to detect any kind of trend in climate date, scientists must average out a running thirty-year set, and those who insist on disparaging scientific facts use a one-year-in-five anomaly to claim that "temperatures are dropping" which is not nonsense but rather a nefarious, intentional distortion and lie. Politically-motivated lies defraud the public of knowledge urgently needed to spur action, and the result will be that we shall all suffer and even perish for it.
Mark Ritzenhein
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +1
The global warming debate has again hijacked discussion of the real problem--general ecocide. Climate change (in either direction) is only one component of the systemic failure. Ecosystem destruction, biodiversity decline, population explosion, consumerism, nuclear proliferation, chemical manufacturing, agriculture, industrial fishing, plastic pollution, etc. represent significant terms in the doom equation. Even if climate remained perfectly stable, these other catastrophic elements appear more than sufficient to disrupt the dominating culture.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +3
Truly you are a voice crying in the wilderness. Thank you!
Suza Francina
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +1

Write comment
smaller | bigger

< Prev   Next >

Culture Change mailing address: P.O. Box 3387, Santa Cruz, California, 95063, USA, Telephone 1-215-243-3144 (and fax).
Culture Change was founded by Sustainable Energy Institute (formerly Fossil Fuels Policy Action), a nonprofit organization.
Some articles are published under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. See Fair Use Notice for more information.