|
by Jan Lundberg
|
|
17 October 2008 |
Culture Change Letter #206, Oct. 18, 2008 --
Society's sad and terminal state is not an abstraction of issues or dollars. It is the wasted human potential of the intelligent, charitable individual who is stifled and hemmed in. Yet, our many wonderful members of society are creatures of artificial "comfort." Convenience comes at costs such as cancer and heart disease that were rare diseases until the last hundred years. Forced by the present economy to be self-centered, we also suppress our creativity and innate potential for triumphing over a clear threat.
|
|
|
by Jan Lundberg
|
|
19 September 2008 |
Culture Change Letter #202 - Sept. 22, 2008 --
My mother was born in 1920 on September 12 on an Idaho sheep farm -- lost to the bankers in the Great Depression -- and she lived until September 15, 2008. She lived mainly in Utah, California, and the Mediterranean. Rejecting religion as a child, moving to L.A. alone as soon as she could to start a career as a reporter, being an organic gardener (before it was called "organic"), she had all the strength a girl and woman can have. She used it well. For the rest of my life I will be reflecting on and trying to grasp her strength and some of her more subtle accomplishment.
|
|
|
by Donna Sheehan and Paul Reffell
|
|
14 September 2008 |
|
Editor's note: From the creators of the performance-art-for-peace project Baring Witness, this eminently sensible appeal to intelligent human behavior can stimulate hearts and minds weary of both activism's weak record and the general slowness in conscious awakening. -- Jan Lundberg
Today, young western women are proudly dressing to display their breasts and bellies, their centers of procreation, as never before. If this style comes from a sense of pride in their bodies, rather than blindly following a trend, it’s a healthy and encouraging sign of a return to the love of femininity. Indeed, our young women are displaying the fount of their Feminine Power.
|
|
|
by Linda Moulton Howe
|
|
10 September 2008 |
Editor's activist alert: by September 29, 2008 the FCC needs to hear your concerns to preserve local control over radiation pollution (time extended past Sept. 15). Details are after the interview in the article below. There are now 1,947,083 microwave towers and antennas in the United States.
 Camouflaged microwave tower, Tucson
Like ubiquitous plastics, cell phones (or mobile phones) have come on like gangbusters for their convenience. But the technology was not tested sufficiently, and there was no one to guard the public from predatory industries and knee-jerk consumerist desire for status objects. We are still flooding the environment and our bodies with the abuses of radiation (and plastics), and foisting them on our children. Eleven-year-old kids with cell phones is now common, but the schools and parents aren't bothering to look at the alleged need and how to meet it with a healthy approach. Whenever I use a cell phone or cordless phone I get a pain deep in my ear after a short time of usage. Some people don't get it (pun intended). - Jan Lundberg
|
|
|
by Deborah Rich
|
|
02 September 2008 |
|
Mum's the word among federal officials about the health benefits of eating organic foods.
The Department of Health and Human Services defers questions about organic foods to the Food and Drug Administration. But the FDA has no policy on organics because it says they're the domain of the Department of Agriculture, which will admit to using the "o-word," but says its mandate is simply to regulate use of the certified organic label, not to judge the relative benefits of organic versus conventional foods.
While the agencies entrusted with safeguarding our food and health pass the potato, a fast-growing body of scientific literature suggests that the connection between farm practices and the healthfulness of our foods merits attention. Organic foods don't come out ahead of conventionally grown foods in 100 percent of comparative tests, but they rise to the top often enough to suggest that organic farming can increase, sometimes dramatically, the nutrient density of what we put in our mouths. |
|
|
by Jan Lundberg
|
|
30 August 2008 |
|
Culture Change #197 August 30, 2008
The key question for our survival may be "Are we out of balance temporarily?", or "Is balance lost and we have to adjust to a new and tougher ecological reality?"
If extinction of humans is part of a re-balancing act by nature, but many species pull through what seems to be a climate extinction we have caused, this may be the best outcome the planet and even humans can hope for. This is a biocentric and "humane" view of our ecological and evolutionary predicament. Why not love what we have, or by extension what the Earth allows? Many humans, however, are of the attitude, "If I'm not here, and humans aren't here, what do I care if the planet freezes or fries?" This column is rarely read by those humans.
We are faced with resolving today's crisis of nature's being thrown into a new balance or imbalance not so favorable for most animals and plants. We can picture as part of our task identifying how we have taken courses of action that unbalanced or supported the balance that prevailed, such as in human relations. People see such struggle daily and may be forced to suppress it. This can be due to surrounding values aided by disempowerment of people and the creation of poverty, by design of the rulers.
|
|
|